Home

Advertisement

kunuloj [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
sarah

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Victims of the Patriarchy [Dec. 6th, 2009|08:59 am]

jessie_c
[Tags|]

Geneviève Bergeron (b. 1968), civil engineering student.
Hélène Colgan (b. 1966), mechanical engineering student.
Nathalie Croteau (b. 1966), mechanical engineering student.
Barbara Daigneault (b. 1967), mechanical engineering student.
Anne-Marie Edward (b. 1968), chemical engineering student.
Maud Haviernick (b. 1960), materials engineering student.
Maryse Laganière (b. 1964), budget clerk in the École Polytechnique's finance department.
Maryse Leclair (b. 1966), materials engineering student.
Anne-Marie Lemay (b. 1967), mechanical engineering student.
Sonia Pelletier (b. 1961), mechanical engineering student.
Michèle Richard (b. 1968), materials engineering student.
Annie St-Arneault (b. 1966), mechanical engineering student.
Annie Turcotte (b. 1969), materials engineering student.
Barbara Klucznik-Widajewicz (b. 1958), nursing student.

Many people might find this controversial, but I believe that the killer was another kind of victim of the Patriarchy. Nothing excuses what he did, nothing can erase his responsibility, yet he too died that day. So much potential was destroyed. 12 Engineers who could have built the future. A Nurse who could have helped to heal so many. An Administrator who could have helped further the careers of countless young people. And the killer whose manhood was perverted by the Patriarchy.

He was indoctrinated from an early age to believe that men are somehow deserving of the right to be superior. He was taught not to accept that women are equal to men, that we have the same rights as he did, that we're worthy of being treated as equals. He had been taught that men are superior, that men deserve everything handed to them on a silver platter just because they're men. Once confronted by women with abilities he lacked, with drive, determination and intelligence that he couldn't equal, he broke. He couldn't accept that here were women superior to a "naturally" superior man. So he did what he was taught to believe any red-blooded man was "supposed" to do: he killed random women. Then he killed himself. The Patriarchy won again. The so-threatening women were eliminated (and it didn't matter who they were) and its flawed tool eliminated as well.

The Patriarchy respects neither women nor men as long as it remains in power. The sooner men learn this, the better off the Human race will be.

There are men who do not kill. There are men who understand what feminism means. These men threaten the Patriarchy. These men are our allies. The killer could have been one of those men if the Patriarchy hadn't indoctrinated him. He wasn't allowed to be. This is the tragedy the Patriarchy foists upon men. They are its victims too, if only they could realise it.

I realise that what I'm writing here sounds like "but what about teh poor menz!" and I don't want it to come out that way. 14 women were brutally slain for no valid reason. That is the huge tragedy we must remember today. I want men to learn that the free ride they may think they're getting is no free ride at all. Every man who allows the Patriarchy to continue its rule bears responsibility for the deaths that result from that rule.
LinkLeave a comment

Random stuff that didn't make it into my previous post. [Dec. 5th, 2009|08:44 pm]

alexandraerin
[Tags|, , , , ]

( You are about to view content that may only be appropriate for adults. )
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

Reviews of a few of the books I finished recently [Dec. 5th, 2009|05:56 pm]
limyaael_ij


Ilona Andrews, Magic Bites

This is urban fantasy set in a future Atlanta where technology and magic come in “waves” that impact the functioning of cars, buildings, electricity, and many other aspects of daily life. Magic has been around for long enough that humans are adapting to it, as well as to the presence of other creatures like vampires—here, mindless undead beasts “piloted” by necromancers—and lycanthropes—here, victims of the Lycan-V virus and likely to become insane murderers unless they follow a very narrow code of behavior. Magic is slowly winning. The heroine is Kate Daniels, who, as per usual for this kind of book, goes into investigating the violent murder of her guardian with a host of secrets that are not fully explained, unusual combat techniques, and a dark family past.

There are several things I liked about this book. The worldbuilding is clever; it’s very different from the usual “the undead/fae are just starting to come out of hiding or are completely hidden” trope, and that alone earns it a lot of points. It’s also urban fantasy not set in New York City, another point-getter. The violence is brutal and not glossed-over, and there are plenty of different characters who compete for attention. The kickass heroine does have some limitations, and she actually has to stop and think about whether acting like a rabid lone wolf is worth the cost (that is, the consequences of people getting irritated with her). That’s an insight a lot of “normal” fantasy heroes could stand to have.

Also, this is a book that agrees with me that corpses that feed on human blood are not sexy.

I didn’t like the last quarter of the story much. Here a monologuing villain, there a randomly introduced new character that mainly seemed present to make sure the final battle wouldn’t be too tough for Our Heroes, over here the sudden eruption of the skeevy gender dynamics that I think they make you sign a charter to include in your urban fantasy…I’m not sure I’ll read more of the series. The last few pages, however, were enough to restore some of my interest.





Cindy Pon, Silver Phoenix

YA fantasy, set in an alternate world modeled on the Chinese empire. Ai Ling, who is proving impossible to betroth and also hearing people’s thoughts for some reason, is unhappy when her father leaves to go on a mission to the Palace, but is sure he will return soon. He doesn’t. She goes in search of him and runs into a half-foreign young man named Chen Yong, whose parents her father got in trouble for helping years ago. So they pursue their quest together, facing demons, people with one eye and four arms, and being lost forever in an alternate world.

I loved this. It has a setting that’s very unusual for Western fantasy and every character is of color except for the half-white Chen Yong, it makes the heroine the real center of the story and the performer of the quest instead of the young man she meets along the way (Chen Yong’s story is important, but definitely subordinate to Ai Ling’s), it has the heroine make mistakes, it keeps the romance properly subdued, and it has several passages of gorgeous description (I especially adored the dragon). The danger is properly scary. The ending threw my expectations off completely, although I suppose it’s possible to read that as sequel bait. Ai Ling is not as kickass as Kate Daniels, but she seemed much more real to me, despite living in an entirely different world.

It had flaws, of course. One of Ai Ling’s mistakes is so easily resolved that it felt a bit like a cheat; here’s the potential for a lot of conflict and soul-searching, and it goes away in a few pages. I detested the opening prologue, which shows Chen Yong being born, though mainly because I’ve read far too many fantasy prologues that center on the protagonist’s birth, apparently because authors think that the “Ooh! Babies!” impulse will attach you to someone who doesn’t have a name and hasn’t done anything yet. (This is one of the reasons I was so relieved to find out that Ai Ling and not Chen Yong was the main character). The major antagonist is introduced so late that he didn’t feel like as much of a threat to me as the characters took him as.

However, these are faults that didn’t destroy the book for me. I highly recommend it.





Caroline Stevermer, When the King Comes Home

This is a sort of alternate history; there are clear references to our own world, especially through evocations of Christianity and art, but the countries and cities that the story takes place in are imaginary. The main character is Hail Rosamer, who explains carefully in the first lines of the book that she has her name because her father was so happy to have a daughter after four sons, not because she is named after bad weather. Her family are wool merchants, but she travels to the capital city of Aravis to be apprenticed to an artist. The book is an account by Hail, when she’s much older and looking back over her life, of what happened when she became fascinated by the work of an artist named Maspero and got involved in the chaos surrounding the sudden reappearance of King Julian after two hundred years.

This book is an excellent example of how to write a first-person protagonist who comes off as something other than a smartass. Hail is not witty or charming or overwhelmed with angst. She annoys other characters considerably, constantly asks questions, gets obsessed with Maspero, stubbornly clings to her own course of action and then is sorry she did, and tends to see everything in terms of either art in general or Maspero in particular. But the flaws made her seem human to me—probably because I had no sense that the author expected me to love and adore Hail and credit her with every virtue. Not all of the other characters are equally vivid, but Good King Julian, his champion Istvan, and the various soldiers and artists who associate with Hail mostly are. Hail remains on the sidelines for most of the book, since she’s not a soldier and has no political power, but she’s involved in the events all the way from the beginning, and those events are interesting. Plus, I always enjoy a book about a protagonist who has an occupation that’s not mage, fighter, or thief.

Of course, Hail being an observer character has its own problems, in that sometimes the story feels strained as it includes her, and a few important events happen off-stage, away from her vision. The magical background, though required by the story, isn’t particularly detailed or original, which is probably also a result of Hail’s having little familiarity with it. If you don’t like Hail’s obsessions, you are going to find this book annoying as hell.

Luckily, this is one of those books that you would probably know you’d like or hate from reading the first few pages, so I recommend that you do that if you’re interested.

LinkLeave a comment

Weed wrench [Dec. 5th, 2009|01:56 pm]

arcticturtle
It works! I meant to just try it out on a bush or two when I went out to feed the horses. Three hours later...

I'll never see the inside of a gym again.

If you have a lot of non-native bushes to uproot, I highly recommend it!
LinkLeave a comment

Sleep stuff and a belated review of 9. [Dec. 5th, 2009|10:26 am]

alexandraerin
[Tags|, ]

( You are about to view content that may only be appropriate for adults. )
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

“The Bitch of Living” [Dec. 5th, 2009|07:12 am]

moofable
( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Exotic, invasive, and doomed. [Dec. 5th, 2009|02:04 am]

arcticturtle
My Heavy Weed Wrench has arrived. Tonight, late in the night, I assemble it and quietly test the mechanism. It's the heaviest hand tool I've ever owned, heavier than a sledgehammer or a Collins axe or a chainsaw. I carry it with both hands. It feels like power. It feels like vengeance.

I want the sun to rise.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Ah, this is more like it [Dec. 4th, 2009|05:14 pm]

jessie_c
[Tags|]
[Current Mood |contemptuous]

Harper is back to his old habits of shooting himself in the foot, this time with a little help from China.

Now if only our electorate could remember things like this instead of his grandstanding and increasingly desperate lies.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

New Thoughts on Letting Fringe Groups Marry [Dec. 4th, 2009|06:32 pm]

i_am_pansexual

[e_moondragon]
[Current Mood | amused]

Turning the tables...

much thx to [info]eidolonamorata 's last post here, it reminded me i had something everyone might find equally funny!

New Thoughts on Letting Fringe Groups MArry

I am completely in favor of allowing Christians to get married, and I think that trying to prevent it is unjust and a mistake.


Christianity is not a disease. Christians, even though they are disliked or mistrusted by many, are normal people and should have the same rights as everyone else, as if they were, let's say, homosexuals or computer programmers.

I am aware of the fact that many traits in the behavior of Christians, such as their attitudes towards sex, may seem strange to the rest of us. I also know that some of their traditions, like the public exhibition of images of tortured people, may make some people feel uncomfortable.

But all this, besides being an image transmitted by the media rather than the reality, is not a reason to prevent their marriage. Some could argue that Christian marriage is not real marriage, because to them, it is a ritual, and a covenant with their god, instead of a contract for the union of two people. Also, since sex outside marriage is condemned by Christianity, some could say that allowing Christians to marry would encourage marriages in order to avoid shame in their communities or simply because they wish to have sex (forbidden to them outside a marriage), increasing domestic violence and dysfunctional families. But we have to remember that this is not exclusive of Christian families and that, since we cannot know the thoughts of others, we should not judge their intimate motivations.

On the other hand, to say that their unions are not true marriage and that therefore they should be given some other name is just a mean, petty technique to lead the debate towards semantic questions that are beside the point. Even among Christians, marriage is marriage and a family is a family.

And with this I will go on to another very controversial subject that I hope does not seem too radical: I am also in favor of allowing Christians to adopt children. Some people might be outraged by my affirmation. A few are likely to reply, "Christians adopting!? Those kids could become Christians!"

I see that type of criticism and my answer is this: even though the children of Christians have a much higher likelihood of becoming Christians also (contrary to what happens to the children of homosexuals or computer programmers), I have already made clear that I believe Christians to be human beings like everybody else.

Despite the opinions of some and the hints that we have, there is no conclusive evidence that Christian parents are less well equipped to raise a child, or that the religiously biased atmosphere of a Christian home is a negative influence of a child. Besides, adoption offices judge each case individually so it should be up to these to determine whether a pair of parents is the right one or not.

In short, in spite of what some people think, I believe that Christians should have the right to get married and to adopt children. Just like homosexuals, or computer programmers.

By TROUBODOR@aol.com
Link13 comments|Leave a comment

Afghanistan [Dec. 4th, 2009|02:19 pm]

arcticturtle
I know a lot of people who want to stop fighting in Afghanistan immediately. I'm actually very hazy about what they're suggesting. I assume it's not simply "withdraw everybody and let the dice fall where they may" - or is it? I can't tell. I haven't heard what the alternate suggestions are.

After the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, we got involved enough to make sure everything there got broken. Once the Soviets left, we lost interest and basically forgot about it. That's why the Taliban exists.

In 2001, we got involved again, for a year or so; then we lost interest and sent all but a skeleton crew off to Iraq. That's how the Taliban got its second lease on life.

Among people who want to end the war immediately, are there any suggestions for how to keep it from becoming a third round of "America loses interest - Afghanistan goes to hell"?

I'm very much in favor of President Obama's plan. "Surge, then draw down" seems to be working pretty well in Iraq, despite strenuous complaints from doves who hated sending more troops AND hawks who hated a preannounced drawdown plan. You could object that expecting the same strategy to work twice in two different countries is simplistic, but it's the only strategy I know under consideration that isn't, in fact, a proven failure.

One thing I'd really like to add to Obama's strategy, though. I want a dedicated war tax. I can't endure any more "I think this war is worth other people losing their lives for; however, I don't want it to cost me any money." That attitude should be left behind with the rest of W's legacy.
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

the truth has died - more: FRIENDS CUT [Dec. 3rd, 2009|10:24 pm]

madman101
SLATED FOR REMOVAL:

_venusinfursx
adrogynous_
brokendesirexo
emo_piccolo
gianni_v
hatefucker
misformachete
notxa_safebet
punksurfer83
rachel_friends
redheadmeg
silentmusic_
soul_demise
supergirl01
theracewalker
thetruthhasdied
unspokenxword
venus_as_a_grrl
(To remain alive in my JOURNAL, you need to make a post in your own before I drops yas like i done to them other hillbillies).

SORRY - I NEED TO POST THESE NAMES in case there's the slightest chance they can see this and return to life. Don't let it bother you! These people haven't been around for years.

I've been eating yams and chicken bacon - that's right - i made some kind of chicken bacon/jerky for dog and: TASTY. Plus salty cornbread.

I still don't know how to do a "FRIENDS ONLY" banner, & "COMMENT HERE" - - - I have all comments restricted to you, my beloved minions - and i want it that way. HOW DO I DO? fine thank you....?! donde estafon helpez moi?
LinkLeave a comment

I wrote this last night [Dec. 3rd, 2009|11:24 pm]

i_am_pansexual

[eidolonamorata]
After the NY Senate chose to vote 'no' on equal marriage rights, I wrote this little piece and posted it on my FB:

Today the NY Senate voted 'no' to gay marriage and preserved the sanctity and future of traditional marriage. Gays and lesbians are the number one threat to marriage today. It is a little known fact, but homosexuals are responsible for 100% of ALL divorces in NY. Either by causing spouses to outgrow one another, or by messing about with married people's bank accounts so that they have financial problems which cause friction, there is a gay person behind every divorce.

What about homes where domestic violence (a blatant violation of marriage vows) is the soup du jour? If you go into these homes you will find a gay person right there, giddy with delight at the disintegration of the sanctity of marriage, cheering on the abusive spouse. And don't even get me STARTED on homes where sexual abuse is involved. Gay people can't incite that kind of behaviour enough!
You may ask, "What about spouses who cheat? Surely THEY are responsible for their own actions and the subsequent cheapening of marriage?" Well, my friend, I'm sorry to tell you, but you have been suckered in by the propoganda of the gay agenda. It's a tempting fiction, but here's the truth.
FACT: every single person who cheats does so with either a gay man or lesbian woman who has strategically placed themselves in that person's life to compel them to break their marriage vows. It is all part of the master plan of the gay agenda.

So I congratulate the NY Senate on their decision today. They are defending and upholding all that is good and right in this world. My only question is, is it really enough? We are still at risk here, people. As long as there is one homosexual allowed the same rights as we real people to walk freely in this country, I'm sad to say I'm not sure we'll ever be truly safe.

This is Naarah-Blue Meath, an upholder of TRUE marriage rights, saying "Goodnight New York, and well done."
********In case anyone missed it, this is dripping with sarcasm and bitterness*********
Link10 comments|Leave a comment

(yes subject) [Dec. 3rd, 2009|04:08 pm]

alexandraerin
[Tags|, , , , , , ]

( You are about to view content that may only be appropriate for adults. )
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

Yay! [Dec. 3rd, 2009|01:10 am]

scarlett_h
[Tags|, ]
[Current Mood | cheerful]
[Current Music |Lady GaGa - Bad Romance (Starsmith Remix) | Powered by Last.fm]

It's that time of year again! :D

And So This Is Christmas: Tunes To Sparkle The Dark Up [2009 Edition] is my personal ultimate Christmas compilation. Some of these songs have been a part of my Christmas soundtrack since I was a young'un, some of them are more recent favorites - but they all mean Christmas to me. :)

Changes: I added one more song this year, Kate Bush's beautiful "Home For Christmas" - otherwise, it's not any different from last year's edition. :)

December will be magic again )

Happy listening! :D
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

I'm thankful for stuff! [Dec. 3rd, 2009|12:58 am]

scarlett_h
[Tags|]
[Current Mood | chipper]
[Current Music |Lady GaGa - Monster | Powered by Last.fm]

Whoops, I almost forgot to do my annual Thanksgiving list of things I'm most thankful for! Better late than never, I guess. :) The 5 serious things are always the same, but I think that's a good thing - it's great when the big things in your life go well.

The 5 serious things I'm thankful for...

1. Family and friends!!
2. My and my family's decent health. We've all had some problems this year, and I'm thankful that we're all still in one piece at the moment!
3. This semester was a good one! Learned a lot and enjoyed it, too. :) I also declared my major, so I'm feeling great.
4. Happiness continues to be an option.
5. The little things in life!

The 5 not so serious things I'm thankful for...

6. 2009 was a fantastic year for music!
7. More good things in music form - it's Christmas music time!
8. Tumblr.
9. LiveJournal.
10. Oh heck - the internet. :D

Cheery bye, Scarlett
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

Signal boost [Dec. 3rd, 2009|12:40 am]
limyaael_ij
Winterfox on LJ asked me to link to this post about a friend of hers who is facing eviction. This is what Winterfox says about it, since she explains the situation better than I can:

A friend of mine, shuju_the_red (http://shuju-the-red.livejournal.com/) is facing eviction if she can't gather $2,500 within a few days. She lives in the Philippines and this amount is very, very hefty for her; combined that with the fact that she had to bribe the police to get her mother out of a military camp not long ago--it cost her $10,000--she's severely hard-pressed to dredge up more money right now.

My own journal has limited exposure and I was hoping you might be willing to link to my friend's entry detailing Ju's circumstances, because every cent will help.
LinkLeave a comment

Marfrukto, aŭ marisko? [Dec. 2nd, 2009|02:17 pm]

esperanto

[glitterboy4519]
Ĉi tie iu demandis kiel oni diras "I am very allergic to shellfish" en multaj lingvoj.

Kiel oni esperantigus "shellfish"?

Mi volas diri: Mi havas grandan alergion kontraŭ marfruktoj.

Ĉu estas diferenco inter marfrukto kaj marisko? Laŭ Vikipedio, "La vortoj marfrukto kaj marisko havas la saman signifon." Sed ankaŭ specifas, ke "La vorto marisko (kiu ne estas en PIV) devenas de formo komuna al la hispana kaj la portugala (marisco)."

Vi preferas diri marfrukton, aŭ mariskon? Kiuj vortoj estas por nomi la diversajn fiŝtipojn?

(Bonvoluuuu ekskuzu mian malbonan esperanton... Mi ne konas neniun, krom homoj en-lineo, ke parolas esperanton, nek ke volas lerni ĝin kun mi ;_; )
Link8 comments|Leave a comment

Rant on avoiding a villain monologue [Dec. 2nd, 2009|01:41 am]
limyaael_ij
I’m sorry to have been gone so long. Major health issues as well as writer’s block on the rants meant that I had little to post. While I think I’ll be posting more regularly again, I can’t promise it.

_____________________________________________________________________________

This rant brought to you by Magic Bites, an urban fantasy novel that I read recently and liked well enough—with the exception of one major irritant. I bet you can guess right now what it is.



1) A traitor can tell you as much information as the villain and with better motivation. What bothers me the most about the villain confessing all his plans to the hero or heroine is that usually, he has no reason to do so. Indeed, it’s far better for him and for the plot if he keeps silent. Suspense and suspension of disbelief are not always cousins, but they are here.

If you absolutely must have someone in the know explain all the villain’s Byzantine plots to the protagonist, why not choose a traitor? Surely there has to be someone in the villain’s organization, army, or commune dissatisfied with the way he or she’s been treated. Or it could be because of something the heroes have done. Someone who’s watched her comrades go down to defeat after defeat can easily conclude that she’d like to be on the winning side just as much.

Now, the traitor might have only partial knowledge, depending on how important she was to the villain’s side. But so what? The partial knowledge means a longer tease, leading up to the all-important revelation scene when the protagonist stands awed by the gloomy glory of the villain’s plan. (See point 2).

There’s no reason to rely on dusty dramatic conventions for that all-important monologue when good old-fashioned self-interest will do.

2) Want a mystery element to your plot? Let the protagonist figure out what the villain wants. Quite a lot of stories have an element of the protagonist being puzzled by the villain’s actions. That is fine. Quite a few of these stories then go on to have the villain explain his actions to the protagonist. Not fine.

Seriously, why would you do this? If you’re going to introduce a mystery connected to the villain into the plot, presumably it’s there for a greater purpose than to be punctured like a balloon at the climax. Not to mention that someone who conceals her motives has a reason to conceal them, and that reason is never mentioned or simply negated if she eats the Exposition Mushrooms.

There may be a limit to how well your protagonist can play detective, but that’s where cleverness (of both writing and characterization) comes into it. Let her work with other people; that will build up the secondary characters more and save your heroine from leaping to “intuitive” conclusions about things she can’t actually know and becoming an Author’s Darling. Let her have a minor revelation that is reasonable and within limits that she can then use to connect the evidence that baffled her before. Let her consciously try out several different explanations, have them fail, and then pick the one that fits best.

All of these will make for a better plot and stronger growth on the protagonist’s part than forcing her to sit down and have the villain pour her ears full of poison.

3) Why would she believe this anyway? I’m trying to remember if I ever read a villain monologue in which the protagonist doubts what s/he’s hearing. I can remember a few novels in which the protagonist asked questions of the “But that doesn’t make sense! What about X?” variety, but none in which the monologue ended and s/he did anything but gape at the villain and accept that every part of the dastardly plan had happened exactly as the villain said it had.

No, seriously. Here you have someone who has tried to start a war/has committed murder/has committed rape/turned people into zombies/has tried to take over the world/has tried to destroy the whole of time and space/has done all of these things at once, and you believe him?

...Why?

If you think about it, the villain has every motive to lie, because when the protagonist tries to stop him, s/he will be trying to stop the wrong damn plan. I’m sure some of the sadistic villains that certain authors favor would get an extra laugh out of that.

Inserting a disbelieving protagonist into the scene would be a great way to avoid the usual pitfalls of the monologue, if for some reason you think you have a villain who would give such a monologue. But the time and place for such things is limited.

Which is why you take advantage of the ones that do exist.

4) Plant the protagonist in a place where she has reason to overhear the plan. This could mean infiltration; perhaps the villain is gathering an army and the protagonist sneaks in as a recruit, precisely to hear the inspiring speech that the villain gives to his troops. It could mean impersonation; the protagonist takes the place of someone close to the villain, if she is a good enough spy or actor. (Of course, there would have to be a good reason that the protagonist knew that the trusted adviser, or whoever else she’s playing, didn’t already know about the plan and could believably ask for information on it). It could mean magical eavesdropping from a distance, perhaps by astral travel, perhaps through the eyes of an insect or bird. It could mean suborning or seducing someone close to the villain.

Any and all of those would work better than the monologue. The villain must, on occasion, discuss his plan with other people. Even if he’s the paranoid sort who would never tell the whole of his scheme to anyone else, he has to give orders to his minions, and the protagonist, if she listened or sneaked around enough, could conceivably put the plan together from the separate sets of those orders.

5) Reconsider the reason for keeping the plan a secret at all. Most fantasy villains have to keep their plans secret because otherwise someone would try to stop them. The problem is, people try to stop them anyway based on whatever cover they come up with. If you’re a villain, and you’re really secretly trying to steal a country’s most precious art treasures to use them in a dastardly dark magic ritual, invading the country on the pretext of a war instead might hide your purpose but will not hinder the natives’ determination to kick your teeth in.

If the villain is powerful enough to start a war, is he in a position of enough power that he doesn’t have to hide his motives? He might well be. The excessive concern for what the public might think is largely a relic of a) times when mass communication is available, thus transmitting information more quickly than happens in your typical fantasy world, and b) times when the public is seen as having power, which would be less likely in a monarchical government. (Of course, if both of those things are true in your fantasy world, then you could have a lot of fun with a villain who has to offer soothing lies to the press). The villain is more likely to have to lie to the people immediately in power around him rather than everyone in the entire world.

This could actually work to your protagonist’s advantage, as well as for the betterment of your plot by obviating the necessity for a villain monologue. Say your protagonist is part of a group traditionally considered unimportant by her society. If the villain doesn’t bother to hide his power or his plan from that group, that might make her all the more determined to stop him.



Villain monologues irritate me for the same reason that idiot plots do: there’s no reason for them to exist, not when you have so many interesting tricks to avoid them.
Link29 comments|Leave a comment

(no subject) [Dec. 1st, 2009|12:58 pm]

alexandraerin
[Tags|, ]

( You are about to view content that may only be appropriate for adults. )
Link6 comments|Leave a comment

And now, in porcine aviation news... [Nov. 30th, 2009|09:03 pm]

jessie_c
[Tags|]
[Current Mood |astonished]

Pigs indeed fly!

This from the man who tried to vote away same sex marriage not all that long ago, the same man whose not-so-hidden hidden agenda against the LGBT community is not so hidden, the same man who dreams his wet dreams of putting me and all my friends up against the wall here at home. I don't believe it for a second. He's hiding something. Again.
LinkLeave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement